🔍 Read the full analysis: Microsoft Won Favor While Alphabet Fell Short Of Investor Hopes on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading after its October 28 results, while Alphabet shares fell about 10%. Both reported rapid cloud growth and constrained AI capacity, but Microsoft posted positive free cash flow and beat expectations, while Alphabet reported negative free cash flow and missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading following their October 28 earnings reports, as investors weighed cloud growth against cash generation and results versus expectations. Google Cloud grew faster than Microsoft’s Azure, but Alphabet also reported negative free cash flow and missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, while Microsoft beat expectations and remained free-cash-flow positive.
Microsoft reported revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19% from a year earlier, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89. Analysts polled by LSEG had expected $4.73, CNBC reported. Azure revenue increased 48% to $33.2 billion, above the 45% growth rate Microsoft had guided to in July. The company disclosed Azure’s quarterly revenue in dollars for the first time in this report.
Alphabet’s Google Cloud revenue rose 103% to $30.7 billion, outpacing Azure’s growth rate. However, Alphabet missed analyst expectations for total revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, according to the source report, which cites CNBC. It described this as the company’s first revenue and profit miss in nearly four years. The supplied material does not include the analyst consensus figures or Alphabet’s actual totals for those measures.
The cash-flow contrast was stark. Microsoft generated $18.6 billion in free cash flow after investment, while Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion, its second consecutive negative quarter, according to the source. Alphabet raised $28.7 billion through bond issuance and $12.4 billion by selling new shares during the quarter, and did not repurchase shares. Those funding actions are among the reasons investors may have viewed its spending as carrying greater financing risk.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shapes the AI Bet
The results point to a market distinction between rapid AI-related growth and the ability to finance that growth from ongoing operations. Cloud customers are committing large sums, but data centers, chips and related infrastructure require heavy investment before all contracted revenue is recognized. Microsoft reported positive free cash flow in the quarter; Alphabet’s negative figure means its investments exceeded the cash left after operating needs, with bonds and new shares among the financing raised.
That difference does not establish which company will earn more from AI over time. It does help explain why faster cloud growth did not translate into a better immediate share reaction for Alphabet. Investors also had to account for its misses against forecasts, while Microsoft’s results topped expectations. The after-hours moves are a short-term market response, not proof that either company’s strategy will ultimately succeed or fail.
Both businesses also face a supply constraint. Microsoft said some expected capacity deliveries were delayed, and Alphabet has begun renting capacity from third parties, according to the source material. That means demand cannot be assessed solely through reported growth or order books: companies still need to bring computing capacity online and convert commitments into delivered services and cash.
Products Worth Considering
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds
DJI Osmo Pocket 3 Vlogging Camera with 1-Inch CMOS Sensor and 4K Video
DJI Mic 3 Wireless Microphone System (2 Transmitters, 1 Receiver, Charging Case)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Spending, Backlogs and Capacity
The companies’ reported capital-spending figures are not directly interchangeable. Microsoft said capital spending including finance leases was $45.2 billion; cash paid for property and equipment was $39.4 billion, compared with $19.4 billion a year earlier. The source says roughly three quarters of Microsoft’s spending went to short-lived equipment such as GPUs and CPUs. Alphabet’s 2026 capital-expenditure plan remained at $195 billion to $205 billion, while Microsoft’s plan was about $170 billion, down from an approximately $175 billion estimate cited in July. Both companies pointed to higher investment in 2027.
Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said some third-party capacity deliveries expected in the quarter had been delayed. The source reports that this contributed to spending coming in below the $50.7 billion analysts expected, but Hood also anticipated capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and acceleration in the first half of 2027. Alphabet’s cash flow and financing figures are reported in the source as drawn from its earnings release and filings.
Both firms disclosed substantial contracted cloud revenue, but those commitments are not equivalent to cash already received. Microsoft’s commercial remaining performance obligation reached $677 billion, with about 30% expected to be recognized as revenue within 12 months. The source puts Google Cloud customer commitments at $561 billion. Microsoft also reported $10 billion in quarterly revenue from OpenAI, including revenue-sharing payments, according to its filing as described in the source. The companies’ capacity constraints and future spending plans matter to how quickly these commitments can be fulfilled.
Capacity and Returns Still Unsettled
The earnings reports do not establish how quickly either company will turn its AI infrastructure spending into lasting profits. Backlogs represent contracted commitments, not cash collected, and Microsoft says only about 30% of its commercial remaining performance obligation is expected to become revenue within 12 months. The supplied information does not specify how much of either company’s contracted demand may change, be delayed or depend on future capacity availability.
Near-term spending is also subject to timing and delivery risks. Microsoft said expected deliveries slipped, and it expects spending to increase; the source says Alphabet is renting third-party capacity but does not give the cost, duration or scale of those arrangements. It is not clear from the supplied material how much of Alphabet’s negative free cash flow reflects recurring spending versus the timing of payments or other cash-flow items.
The source reports the after-hours share moves but does not provide the trading period, price levels or subsequent regular-session performance. Nor does it include full analyst consensus data for Alphabet’s reported misses. The share-price reaction should be read as the market’s initial response, not a settled assessment of the companies’ longer-term AI economics.
More Spending and Delivery Updates
Investors will look to the companies’ next quarterly reports for evidence that planned infrastructure is arriving and that cloud demand is converting into recognized revenue and cash. For Microsoft, Hood’s guidance, as reported in the source, calls for capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and faster investment in the first half of 2027. The company will also need to show whether delayed GPU and other capacity deliveries are resolved.
Alphabet’s next results should clarify whether Google Cloud can sustain its reported growth and whether its cash generation improves as it funds its investment program. The supplied material gives no dates for the next reports or further company milestones. Until those updates, the central questions are the pace of capacity expansion, the cost of financing it and the returns earned on infrastructure spending.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
The source reports that Microsoft beat analyst expectations for revenue, profit and Azure growth, while Alphabet missed expectations for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising. Microsoft also reported positive free cash flow; Alphabet reported a second consecutive quarter of negative free cash flow. These factors help explain the contrasting after-hours reactions, but they do not establish investors’ full reasoning.
Did Google Cloud grow faster than Azure?
Yes. Google Cloud revenue grew 103% to $30.7 billion, while Azure revenue rose 48% to $33.2 billion, according to the companies’ reported results cited in the source. Azure nevertheless generated more revenue in the quarter.
How much free cash flow did each company report?
Microsoft reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion, its second negative quarter in a row, according to the source. Free cash flow reflects cash remaining after investment as defined in the respective reporting; the supplied material does not provide a full reconciliation for both companies.
What is known about their AI capacity constraints?
The source says Microsoft experienced delays in some expected third-party capacity deliveries, with GPU deliveries extending into the first half of 2027. It also reports that Google has started renting capacity from third parties. Both companies said demand exceeded available supply, but the supplied information does not quantify the full shortfall.
Do the cloud backlogs represent cash already received?
No. Backlog and remaining performance obligations refer to contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized, not cash already collected. Microsoft’s reported commercial remaining performance obligation was $677 billion; the source puts Google Cloud commitments at $561 billion.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
