TL;DR
Tesla disclosed two low-speed crashes involving its Robotaxi fleet in Austin, Texas, where remote teleoperators took control. The incidents highlight ongoing safety and scaling challenges for Tesla’s autonomous ride-hailing efforts.
Tesla has confirmed that its Robotaxi fleet in Austin, Texas, has experienced at least two crashes since July 2025 involving remote teleoperator control, according to newly unredacted data submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
The crashes occurred at low speeds and involved vehicles with safety monitors present. In both incidents, the vehicles were not carrying passengers, and the teleoperators took control after the automated driving system encountered difficulties. The first crash in July 2025 involved the vehicle moving forward while stopped, with the teleoperator increasing speed and turning the vehicle left, resulting in contact with a metal fence. The second, in January 2026, involved the vehicle scraping a construction barricade at approximately 9 miles per hour after the teleoperator took over to assist with navigation.
These incidents are among 17 recorded since last year, with Tesla now providing detailed narrative descriptions after previously redacting crash reports, citing confidentiality. Other crashes include minor contact with objects like mirrors and collisions with animals or static objects, such as chains or bollards. Notably, Tesla’s crashes are generally at low speeds and involve the vehicle being in control or under assistance, contrasting with higher crash rates reported by competitors like Waymo and Zoox.
Why It Matters
The disclosure of these crashes underscores ongoing safety concerns with Tesla’s autonomous vehicle technology, particularly as the company cautiously scales its Robotaxi network. The incidents may influence regulatory scrutiny and public perception of Tesla’s self-driving capabilities, especially given Elon Musk’s recent emphasis on safety as a limiting factor for expansion.
They also highlight the challenges of integrating remote operation into autonomous vehicle deployment, raising questions about the reliability and safety protocols of Tesla’s teleoperation system. The slow scaling of Tesla’s Robotaxi service may be partly attributable to these safety issues, impacting its competitive position in the autonomous ride-hailing market.
Tesla Robotaxi safety monitoring system
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Since launching its Robotaxi service in Austin in July 2025, Tesla has faced scrutiny over safety and operational reliability. The company has been gradually revealing more crash data after years of redacting details, following regulatory pressure. Tesla’s approach to remote operation, allowing teleoperators to control vehicles at low speeds, is a relatively novel aspect of its autonomous system, intended to mitigate risks but also presenting new safety challenges.
Other autonomous vehicle companies like Waymo and Zoox have reported higher crash rates, but Tesla’s fleet remains much smaller, limiting direct comparisons. Elon Musk has publicly stated that safety concerns are slowing the company’s expansion, emphasizing cautious deployment.
“The capability enables Tesla to promptly move a vehicle that may be in a compromising position, thereby mitigating the need to wait for a first responder or Tesla field representative to manually recover the vehicle.”
— Tesla spokesperson (via data submission to NHTSA)
“Making sure things are completely safe is the biggest limiting factor to Tesla expanding the network. We are being very cautious.”
— Elon Musk (public statement, last month)
remote teleoperation vehicle control device
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear how frequently these crashes occur relative to the total number of trips, and whether Tesla’s safety protocols will evolve to reduce incidents. Details about the teleoperation system, such as response times and safety checks, are not publicly available. The full extent of safety risks associated with remote operation is still under assessment by regulators and Tesla.
autonomous vehicle crash prevention tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
Tesla is expected to continue providing detailed crash reports to the NHTSA and may update its safety protocols. Regulatory agencies could increase oversight or impose new safety requirements. Tesla’s scaling plans for its Robotaxi network will likely be influenced by ongoing safety data and public perception.
Tesla autonomous vehicle safety accessories
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Are Tesla Robotaxis considered safe?
Safety is under ongoing evaluation; Tesla reports low-speed crashes involving remote control, but concerns remain about the overall safety and reliability of the system.
How many crashes has Tesla reported since launching its Robotaxi service?
Tesla has recorded at least 17 crashes since last year, with detailed narratives now publicly available after previously being redacted.
What role do teleoperators play in Tesla’s autonomous system?
Teleoperators can take control of vehicles remotely at low speeds to assist or recover vehicles in difficult situations, aiming to improve safety and operational flexibility.
Will these crashes affect Tesla’s plans for expanding Robotaxis?
Potentially, as safety concerns and regulatory scrutiny could slow expansion until more data confirms system reliability and safety improvements.
