TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The latest episode of The Quantum Kid features theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena explaining how a quantum computer might simulate a holographic universe. The report describes his estimate as a specific qubit target but does not provide the number; the required qubits would need to be stable and near-perfect, unlike today’s noisy physical qubits.
The latest episode of The Quantum Kid features theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena discussing how many qubits a quantum computer would need to simulate a holographic universe, a potential way to study quantum gravity. The report says Maldacena gives a specific estimate, but does not state the number; it stresses that the qubits would need to be stable and near-perfect, a standard beyond today’s noisy physical qubits.
Maldacena, of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, explains the holographic principle: the contents of a region of space, including gravity, can be described using information on its boundary. The idea links questions about gravity with quantum information, giving researchers a possible framework for studying gravity with quantum systems.
The episode’s central prospect is that a sufficiently capable quantum computer could simulate a holographic universe, allowing physicists to investigate aspects of quantum gravity in a laboratory. This is presented as a theoretical possibility, not as a result already achieved on a quantum processor. The report supplies no qubit count, assumptions about the simulated universe, or estimate of when hardware might meet the requirements.
A second part of the episode visits Microsoft’s quantum lab in Copenhagen. Ten-year-old co-host Kai speaks with Dr. Lauri Sainiemi about Majoranas and Microsoft’s topological-qubit approach, which is intended to make qubits more robust to noise. The episode connects the physics target with one effort to address the hardware challenge, but does not report a demonstration of a universe simulation or establish that the approach has reached the necessary performance.
Why Logical Qubits Matter
The discussion puts a demanding theoretical use for quantum computing alongside better-known commercial goals such as drug discovery, materials research and optimisation. If quantum computers could model systems involving gravity and quantum information, they could give physicists a way to test and explore ideas that are difficult to investigate experimentally through ordinary means.
But the headline question is not answered by a raw qubit count alone. The report’s caveat about near-perfect qubits matters because physical qubits are noisy, while useful large-scale calculations are expected to require error correction and logical qubits. The gap between a theoretical resource estimate and a working machine may therefore be substantial; the source does not quantify it.
The episode also shows why hardware design is relevant to fundamental physics. A proposal to make qubits more resistant to noise could address one obstacle, but a discussion of an approach is not evidence that it can yet support the scale or reliability a simulation would require.
Products Worth Considering

Amazon Kindle Scribe (32GB) with Premium Pen, Tungsten

Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation

Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Holographic Duality to Hardware
Maldacena’s 1997 paper set out a mathematical model associated with holographic duality, connecting a gravitational theory in a space with a quantum description on its boundary. The Quantum Insider report describes it as the most cited paper in the history of high-energy physics. That history helps explain why a discussion of simulating a holographic universe has drawn attention beyond quantum-computing engineering.
The episode moves from the theoretical concept to a current hardware challenge. Microsoft’s topological-qubit effort uses Majoranas as part of an approach intended to improve stability. Sainiemi discusses the approach and the difficulty of building more stable qubits. The report does not provide technical performance figures or compare the lab’s progress with the capabilities needed for Maldacena’s proposed simulation.
“The episode discusses Majoranas and Microsoft’s topological-qubit approach as an effort to build more stable qubits.”
— Dr. Lauri Sainiemi, Microsoft quantum lab in Copenhagen, as described by The Quantum Insider
The Missing Qubit Estimate
The report says Maldacena gives a specific qubit estimate, but the supplied account does not include the number. It also does not specify what system or level of simulation the estimate assumes, how many logical versus physical qubits would be involved, or how much error correction would be needed. Those details are necessary to assess the scale of the proposal.
It remains unclear how close any existing hardware is to the required reliability, and whether Microsoft’s topological approach can deliver the performance needed. The episode’s discussion does not establish a timeline for a simulation, a completed demonstration, or a benchmark against other quantum-computing methods. The proposal should be read as a theoretical target, not a near-term capability.
What the Episode Can Clarify
The episode itself is the next source for details on Maldacena’s numerical estimate and the assumptions behind it; the original report links to the video but does not reproduce the figure. Further technical information would be needed to distinguish the number of ideal logical qubits from the larger physical-qubit resources that error correction could require.
On the hardware side, future progress would need to be measured through disclosed performance and reliability results, rather than the stated aim of a design. Until such evidence and a complete estimate are available, the key development is a public discussion connecting holographic physics to quantum-computer requirements—not a claim that current machines can simulate a universe.
Key Questions
How many qubits did Juan Maldacena estimate?
The source report says Maldacena gives a specific estimate but does not include the number. The episode or additional reporting would be needed to confirm it.
What is a holographic universe?
In the episode’s explanation, the holographic principle says that the contents of a region of space, including gravity, can be described by information on its boundary.
Could today’s quantum computers run this simulation?
The report does not say they can. It says the required qubits would need to be stable and near-perfect, unlike the noisy physical qubits in current machines.
What is Microsoft’s role in the episode?
The episode visits Microsoft’s Copenhagen lab, where Dr. Lauri Sainiemi discusses Majoranas and topological qubits, an approach intended to make qubits more robust to noise. The report does not say it has achieved the capabilities needed for the proposed simulation.
Source: thequantuminsider.com
