After Town Bans Flock, Councilmember Crashes Out, Proposes Internet and Phone Ban / A Texas councilmember will propose “a total ban on all cellular and GPS-capable devices for all operations within city limits” and “a total termination of all internet services.”

The town of Bandera, Texas, has officially ended its contract with surveillance company Flock, marking a decisive move against government surveillance technology.

In a 3-2 vote, the Bandera city council decided to terminate its agreement with Flock Safety, a provider of AI license plate reader cameras, after months of resident protests and vandalism of surveillance poles. Councilmember Jeff Flowers, a vocal supporter of Flock, responded by announcing plans to introduce a series of measures aimed at banning nearly all digital communication and recording technologies within town limits.

Flowers stated he would propose a ‘Bandera Declaration of Digital Independence,’ which includes a ban on cell phones, internet services, cameras, and GPS-enabled devices. He also indicated plans to revert to a pre-digital era with paper records and cash transactions. Flowers justified these measures by claiming they are necessary to protect residents’ privacy and resist government overreach, dismissing criticisms that such bans are extreme.

Why It Matters

This development is significant because it challenges the role of technology and surveillance in small-town governance and raises questions about privacy rights versus security and convenience. If enacted, these bans could set a precedent for other municipalities wary of surveillance and digital monitoring, potentially igniting broader debates on digital rights and local autonomy.

Ailun Privacy Screen Protector for iPhone 17e / iPhone 16e / iPhone 14 / iPhone 13 / iPhone 13 Pro [6.1 Inch] 2 Pack Anti Spy Private Tempered Glass Case Friendly [Not for iPhone 16 6.1 Inch]

[2 Pack] This product includes 2 pack privacy screen protectors.WORKS FOR iPhone 17e/16e/14/iPhone 13/13 Pro 6.1 Inch tempered…

AmazonView Latest Price

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Background

Bandera, a town of approximately 900 residents, installed Flock’s license plate readers last year using a state grant. The project faced intense opposition from residents, who expressed concerns over privacy and government intrusion. The controversy led to repeated vandalism of the surveillance poles, with the town incurring costs to replace damaged equipment. The recent vote to terminate the contract follows these protests and a shift in the town’s stance on surveillance technology.

Following the vote, Councilmember Flowers publicly announced his intent to push for extensive bans on digital devices, framing his proposal as a defense of personal privacy and a rejection of perceived government overreach. The proposal has yet to be formally introduced or debated in upcoming council meetings, and its legal and practical implications remain uncertain.

“If we are to be truly ‘private,’ we must leave our smartphones at the city line.”

— Councilmember Jeff Flowers

“In the name of preserving privacy, I will suggest the city go back to the days of 1880.”

— Flowers in a letter published by the Bandera Bulletin

What Remains Unclear

It is unclear whether the proposed bans will be formally introduced, how they will be received by the full council, or if they will withstand legal challenges. The practical enforcement of such sweeping restrictions on technology within a modern town is also uncertain, and legal or constitutional issues may arise.

What’s Next

The next step is for Flowers to formally present his proposals at the upcoming city council meeting. The council will then debate and vote on whether to adopt these measures. Further legal review and public response are expected to shape the outcome of this initiative.

Key Questions

Could the town legally ban all cell phones and internet within its limits?

Legal experts suggest that such bans could face significant legal challenges, as they may conflict with state and federal laws protecting communication rights. The enforceability of these measures remains uncertain until formally proposed and debated.

What prompted the council to end its surveillance contract with Flock?

Resident outrage, protests, and vandalism of surveillance equipment prompted the town to vote 3-2 to end its contract, citing concerns over privacy and government overreach.

How might these proposed bans affect residents’ daily lives?

If enacted, residents could be required to revert to paper records, cash transactions, and avoid using smartphones or cameras within town limits, significantly altering daily routines and communication methods.

Will other towns follow Bandera’s example?

It is too early to tell. While some communities have expressed interest in limiting surveillance, widespread adoption of such sweeping bans faces legal, logistical, and practical hurdles.

Source: reddit