TL;DR
Tesla disclosed two low-speed crashes involving Robotaxis operated remotely by teleoperators in Austin, Texas. The incidents occurred in July 2025 and January 2026, with safety monitors present. The new data reveals safety issues as Tesla scales its autonomous ride-hailing network, prompting scrutiny.
Tesla has confirmed through newly unredacted NHTSA data that its Robotaxi fleet has experienced at least two crashes involving remote teleoperator control in Austin, Texas, in 2025 and early 2026. Both incidents occurred at low speeds, with safety monitors present, and no passengers onboard. This disclosure marks a significant shift in Tesla’s transparency regarding its autonomous vehicle safety record and raises questions about the safety and scalability of its autonomous ride-hailing network.
According to the data submitted to NHTSA, the first crash took place in July 2025, shortly after Tesla’s Robotaxi network began operating in Austin. During this incident, a teleoperator took control when the Tesla Automated Driving System (ADS) was stopped on a street, gradually increasing speed and turning the vehicle left toward the curb, resulting in contact with a metal fence. The second crash occurred in January 2026, when the teleoperator intervened as the vehicle was stopped, and the Tesla made contact with a temporary barricade at approximately 9 miles per hour, scraping the front-left fender and tire.
Additionally, Tesla’s unredacted reports reveal other minor incidents, including a Tesla clipping its mirrors on other vehicles and two crashes involving obstacles like a dog and a metal chain. The dog incident, in September 2025, involved the Tesla failing to avoid a running dog, which then ran away. The chain incident involved an unprotected left turn into a parking lot, where the vehicle collided with a metal chain. Tesla’s data also shows that most crashes involve the vehicle hitting obstacles or being hit by other vehicles, rather than causing crashes itself.
Why It Matters
This development is significant because it offers rare transparency into Tesla’s autonomous vehicle safety record, particularly the role of remote teleoperators in crash incidents. The disclosures come amid ongoing industry scrutiny over the safety of robotaxi fleets, especially as Tesla’s network remains limited compared to competitors like Waymo. The incidents highlight ongoing safety challenges and may influence regulatory oversight, public perception, and Tesla’s pace of scaling its autonomous ride-hailing service.
How to Be a Better Driver: Driver Assist & Autopilot Logbook: Track trips · monitor performance · log takeovers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Since July 2025, Tesla has operated its Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, marking its first foray into autonomous ride-hailing at scale. The company has previously emphasized that remote operators can pilot vehicles at speeds under 10 mph to assist in difficult situations. However, Tesla had historically redacted crash details, citing confidentiality. The recent release of unredacted data by NHTSA provides new insight into safety issues, including incidents where Tesla’s system struggled to navigate or avoid obstacles, leading to crashes with minimal injuries or property damage.
Industry-wide, other companies like Waymo and Zoox have reported higher crash counts, but Tesla’s smaller operational scale means its incident rate appears lower. Elon Musk has publicly stated that safety concerns are a primary reason for Tesla’s cautious expansion of its robotaxi network.
“Our remote operators are a critical part of Tesla’s safety protocol and are only used in specific situations at low speeds.”
— Tesla spokesperson
“The recent disclosures provide valuable data that will help inform our ongoing safety assessments of autonomous vehicle operations.”
— NHTSA official
SwitchBot Universal Remote Control with Hub 3, Multi-use Smart Remote with Customize App, Control 25 IR/Bluetooth Devices and 10 Scenes, Compatible with TV/AC/SwitchBot BLE Devices
- Device Compatibility: Supports IR and Bluetooth devices
- Device Control Capacity: Controls 25 devices and 10 scenes
- Included Hub: Hub 3 for setup and IR learning
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear how many of these incidents might have resulted in injuries or more significant damage, as Tesla’s reports focus mainly on property contact. The full scope of Tesla’s safety measures during these incidents and the precise circumstances leading to each crash are still under investigation. Additionally, the impact of these disclosures on Tesla’s future deployment plans and regulatory scrutiny is not yet determined.
Ultrasonic Sensor for Vehicle Detection & Parking, Wide Application in Robot Obstacle Avoidance, with Stable Output
- Range: 3cm to 450cm accurate distance measurement
- Stable Output: Enhanced stability with intelligent algorithm
- Durable Design: IP67 waterproof and temperature compensated
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
Tesla is expected to continue providing detailed crash reports to NHTSA, potentially increasing transparency. Regulatory agencies may review these incidents for safety protocol adjustments or new guidelines. Tesla might also update its safety procedures or limit remote operation capabilities as a result. Further incidents or disclosures could influence the pace at which Tesla expands its Robotaxi fleet.
Hot Wheels Toy Car RC, Remote-Control Tesla Cybertruck in 1:64 Scale, On- or Off-Track Play, Includes Controller & Adapter
- Scale Size: 1:64 scale mini car
- Remote Control: Includes controller and adapter
- Hot Wheels Design: Iconic decos and stylings
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How many crashes involving Tesla Robotaxis have been reported?
Since July 2025, Tesla has reported at least 17 crashes involving its Robotaxi fleet, with two involving teleoperator control, according to recent NHTSA disclosures.
Are there injuries from these crashes?
There are no reports of injuries from these incidents. Most crashes involved low speeds and minor property damage.
Why did Tesla previously redact crash details?
Tesla cited confidentiality and proprietary reasons for redacting crash descriptions, but recent disclosures suggest a shift toward transparency.
What does this mean for Tesla’s autonomous vehicle plans?
The incidents highlight ongoing safety challenges and may slow Tesla’s scaling of its Robotaxi network as regulators and the company prioritize safety.
